首页> 外文OA文献 >Cefotetan Susceptibility Testing Against Anaerobic Bacteria From Obstetrical and Gynecologic Sources: Comparison of Five Different Methods
【2h】

Cefotetan Susceptibility Testing Against Anaerobic Bacteria From Obstetrical and Gynecologic Sources: Comparison of Five Different Methods

机译:头孢替坦对厌氧菌的药敏试验 妇产科细菌: 五种不同方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Five different antibiotic susceptibility methods were utilized to test the effectiveness of cefotetanagainst 200 anaerobic bacteria recovered from patients with obstetrical or gynecological infections. The object of this study was to determine if a more economical and rapid method for anaerobicsusceptibility testing was as acceptable as the reference agar dilution method. The five methodswere: 1) broth disk elution, 2) microbroth technique, 3) a commercially available microbroth technique,4) a commercially available spiral gradient technique, and 5) reference agar dilution. Theminimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) calculated from the spiral gradient technique were equalto or within one doubling dilution of the reference system in 99.5% of cases, while the percentage forthe commercially available microbroth system was 96.8%, very similar to the microbroth techniqueused in our laboratory that yielded a percentage of 96.3. The disk elution method correlated to thereference agar dilution method in 95.3% cases. While the overall agreement between these techniquesis good, especially for the spiral gradient system, clustering of certain organisms near thebreakpoint of the antibiotic tested results in variability in the labeling of these organisms as susceptibleor resistant. This problem appears to be particularly significant for the disk elution method. Therefore, further refinements in these methods of suscleptibility testing are needed in order toprovide a more clinically useful assessment of the susceptibility or resistance of certain bacterialisolates.
机译:使用五种不同的抗生素敏感性方法来测试从产科或妇科感染患者中回收的头孢替坦对200种厌氧菌的有效性。这项研究的目的是确定一种更经济,更快速的厌氧敏感性试验方法是否与参考琼脂稀释法一样可接受。这五种方法是:1)肉汤圆盘洗脱,2)微汤技术,3)市售微汤技术,4)市售螺旋梯度技术和5)参考琼脂稀释。在99.5%的情况下,通过螺旋梯度技术计算出的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)等于或在参考系统的一倍稀释度之内,而市售微泡系统的百分比为96.8%,与我们实验室中使用的微泡技术非常相似产生了96.3的百分比。圆盘洗脱法与参考琼脂稀释法相关的占95.3%。尽管这些技术之间的总体协议是好的,尤其是对于螺旋梯度系统,但是某些生物的聚集在所测试的抗生素的断裂点附近导致了这些生物标记为易感性的变异。对于磁盘洗脱方法,此问题似乎特别重要。因此,需要对这些敏感性测试方法进行进一步的改进,以便对某些细菌分离物的敏感性或耐药性提供更临床上有用的评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号